Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898

Tenesci v. Societa Italiano Abruzzo

Tenesci v. Societa Italiano Abruzzo
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1898
23 Misc. 763; 51 N.Y.S. 362

Counsel

Sewards & Sewards, for appellant., Thomas J. Purdy, for respondent.

Tenesci v. Societa Italiano Abruzzo

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The justice, in rendering judgment in favor of the defendant, made the following indorsement upon the' back of the summons: Judgment for the defendant, as he failed to *764comply with, the by-laws, and further that bib sickness-Was not such as to prevent him working.” Am examination of the return,, as - amended, discloses the-fact that the by-laws upon which the justice assumed to act had never been introduced in evidence. It ■thus appears that the judgment was rendered upon facts not proven upon.the trial. It, therefore, follows that the'judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. ■ • I

Present: BeekMan, P. J., Gildersleevé and Giegerich, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. ■ ■'- •' ■ ¡

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.