Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898

Sheridan v. Presas

Sheridan v. Presas
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 1898
25 Misc. 763; 54 N.Y.S. 125

Counsel

Olcott, Mestre & Gonzalez, for appellant., Howe & Hummel, for respondent.

Sheridan v. Presas

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The question of the identity of the diamonds, received by the plaintiff’s assignor, with those received by Plaza from Presas, was in issue. The trial justice has found against the defendant upon that point. As the evidence was of 'such a character as to admit of this finding, we cannot say that the judgment was against the weight of evidence.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Qtldersleeve and Giegkerich, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.