Ryan v. Voelkl
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $179.90, being the balance due on contract and for extra work done on an extension to the defendant’s premises. The answer embraces an admission to the extent of $97.20, a general denial and a counterclaim in the sum of $300 for imperfect work and delay. Respecting the item of delay no proof was offered. As to the other issues the conflicting evidence was weighed by the court, and resulted in an adjustment of the respective claims in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $116. We find that conclusion amply justified by the evidence. The 'defendant seeks reversal upon the denial of his motion to dismiss the complaint, on the-ground that there was failure to prove that the work was done to the satisfaction of the architect and in compliance with the laws of the health department. We find no provision in the agreement introduced in evidence calling for the satisfaction of
Freedman, P. J., and MacLean, J., concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.