Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899

Lora v. Dora

Lora v. Dora
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1899
27 Misc. 806; 58 N.Y.S. 1144

Counsel

John Palmieri, for appellants., William C. Timm, for respondent.

Lora v. Dora

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This case presents only the question of fact whether the goods, which were the subject of the action, were sold at. a new price or subject to' a discount. The justice found in favor of the latter _ contention and accordingly, upon testimony amply warranting his conclusion,. found in. favor of the. defendant. The judgment should be affirmed.

Present:' Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment' affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.