Nicoll v. Karrick
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff based this action upon two several agreements or orders: one for the making of a photo-engraving of the defendant for use in a publication, at the agreed price of $100, and the other for a copy of that publication, at the agreed price of $25. The signing of the orders was admitted by the defendant, who, however, contended that the plaintiff had not kept his part of the undertaking, and had made false representations respecting the same, and also, for a separate and distinct defense, that a former action was brought against him to recover upon the same causes of action set forth in the complaint herein, and that upon a trial thereof judgment was rendered in his favor and against the plaintiff, and that by reason of such adjudication the plaintiff was estopped from maintaining this action. The memorandum of the decision or judgment in the action pleaded as an estoppel was a
Freedman, P. J., and Leventritt, J., concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.