Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899

Carr v. Hilton

Carr v. Hilton
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 15, 1899 · Leventritt
28 Misc. 782; 59 N.Y.S. 1100

Counsel

Howard P. Okie, for appellants., William R. Bronk, for respondent.

Carr v. Hilton

Opinion of the Court

Leventritt, J.

This judgment must be affirmed. The record presents no question of law, and on the sole question of fact litigated — whether the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s father was the real party in interest — the justice found against the defendants. Ho injustice has been done, and following our settled practice, we shall not disturb his finding.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Freedman, P. J., and MacLean, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.