Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899

Bauer v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Bauer v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 1899 · Ereedmatt
29 Misc. 636; 61 N.Y.S. 164

Counsel

Leon Huhner, for appellant., Henry A. Robinson, for respondent.

Bauer v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

Ereedmatt, P. J.

After the rendition of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff herein, the trial judge, for reasons stated by him in his order, set aside the verdict as being against the weight of evidence and ordered a new trial. The question whether the verdict is against the weight of evidence is one the determination of which rests in the sound discretion of the court. Luhrs v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 11 App. Div. 173; S. C., 42 N. Y. Supp. 606. An examination of the record in the case at bar does not disclose such an abuse of this discretion as to warrant a reversal of the order made.

MacLeatt, J., concurs; Levbhtritt, J., taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.