Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899

Leto v. Smith

Leto v. Smith
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 15, 1899
29 Misc. 762

Counsel

James R. Bowen, for appellant., Charles F. Bliss, for respondents.

Leto v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The record failing to show that the defendant resides within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court, the judgment must be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs in each case to appellant to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.