Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899

Kamsler v. Schaefer

Kamsler v. Schaefer
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 15, 1899 · MacLean
30 Misc. 765; 61 N.Y.S. 1139

Counsel

Herman R. Elias, for appellant., John Callahan, for respondent.

Kamsler v. Schaefer

Opinion of the Court

MacLean, J.

It is possible that the plaintiff would have given proof to support his assertion herein, that a balance was due him for goods sold and delivered to the defendant, had counsel been at pains to question him about the facts; but in the absence of evidence to support the plaintiff’s claim, there remained nothing for the learned justice below but to render judgment for the defendant, as he did, which judgment should be affirmed.

Freedman, P. J., and Leventbitt, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.