Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899

Goldsmith v. Sachs

Goldsmith v. Sachs
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 15, 1899
30 Misc. 767; 61 N.Y.S. 1137

Counsel

Otto H. Droege, for appellant., Jacob B. Engel, for respondent.

Goldsmith v. Sachs

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The disputed questions of fact whether the note was transferred to the plaintiff before or after maturity and whether any consideration passed between the original parties, were resolved against the plaintiff, and the record presents nothing for our consideration warranting interference with the judgment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.