Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899

Perlus v. Spiess

Perlus v. Spiess
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 25, 1899 · Ctjriam
60 N.Y.S. 462 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

House, Grosman & Vorhaus, for appellants., Leopold W. Harburger, for respondent.

Perlus v. Spiess

Opinion of the Court

PER CTJRIAM.

The record failing to show that the defendants reside within the jurisdiction of the municipal court, the judgment must be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151, 59 N. Y. Supp. 266, 319.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.