Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Ebling v. Saracena

Ebling v. Saracena
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 15, 1900 · MacLean
30 Misc. 444; 62 N.Y.S. 1135

Counsel

Albert L. Phillips, for appellant., Platzek & Stroock, for respondent.

Ebling v. Saracena

Opinion of the Court

MacLean, J.

By his answer to the petition herein to recover the possession of real property, the defendant put in issue the term of his tenancy, and although that issue was the only one raised and contested, it appears from the final order itself that the result was arrived at from incidents dehors both the pleadings and the proofs. Therefore, the order must be reversed.

Ebeedman, P. J., and Leventbitt, J., concur.

Order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.