Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Herzog v. Shapiro

Herzog v. Shapiro
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 15, 1900 · Gorman
30 Misc. 782; 62 N.Y.S. 780

Counsel

Louis B. Boudin, for appellant., Epstein Brothers, for respondents.

Herzog v. Shapiro

Opinion of the Court

O’Gorman, J.

The defense of the nonjoinder of Betsy Shapiro, a necessary party defendant, is clearly established by the proofs. Apart from this point, however, the evidence amply supports the conclusion reached by the court below on the facts, and the judgment appealed from should not be disturbed.

Beekman, P. J., and Giegerich, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.