Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Foreman v. Goldberg

Foreman v. Goldberg
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 15, 1900
30 Misc. 785; 62 N.Y.S. 753

Counsel

A. I. Spiro, for appellant., A. H. Sarasohn, for respondent.

Foreman v. Goldberg

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The evidence in this case fails to establish a contract of employment, and the judgment rendered for damages, for wrongful discharge, is absolutely without proof to support it. No period or rate of wages was specified, and the complaint should have been dismissed. Martin v. New York Life Ins. Co., 148 N. Y. 117.

Present: Beekman, P. J.; Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.