Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Root v. Gallanner

Root v. Gallanner
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 15, 1900
30 Misc. 799; 63 N.Y.S. 1115

Counsel

Sproull, Harmer & Sproull, for appellant., Matthew E. Ennis, for respondent.

Root v. Gallanner

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The jury not being bound to credit either defendant or his wife, could have found in the circumstances sufficient to warrant a finding of performance on the part of the plaintiff.

The verdict should, therefore, not be disturbed. Some irrelevant evidence was admitted, but in view of its substance we believe the defendant was not prejudiced.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.