Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Dunican v. Conforti

Dunican v. Conforti
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 15, 1900
30 Misc. 799; 63 N.Y.S. 467

Counsel

Adolph. Cohen, for appellants., Foley, Wray & Taylor, for respondent.

Dunican v. Conforti

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The record fails to disclose the residences of the defendants. The judgment is therefore reversed and a new trial ordered in the Municipal Court in the district in which the action was brought, without costs. See Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.