Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Hutkoff v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 15, 1900

30 Misc. 802; 63 N.Y.S. 198

Counsel

Robinson, Biddle & Ward, for appellant., Nathan, Leventritt & Perham, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The evidence of the witness Sammeck warrants a conclusion that the-glass was in good condition when it was delivered upon the car. .

*803As the defendant’s counsel upon the argument conceded that if this conclusion was warranted the judgment must be affirmed, it is-affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.