Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Deegan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Deegan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 15, 1900 · Giegebich
31 Misc. 743; 64 N.Y.S. 12

Counsel

La Fetra & Glaze (E. B. La Fetra, of counsel), for appellant., Henry A. Robinson and John T. Little, Jr., for respondent.

Deegan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

Giegebich, J.

The only questions involved upon this appeal arise from a determination of the facts, as to which there was a *744conflict of testimony. The finding of the justice in favor of the defendant is warranted by the evidence, and we see no reason for disturbing such determination in the absence of the elements which are requisite to a review of the facts. Lynes v. Hickey, 4 Misc. Rep. 522.

As we are unable to discover any ground for disturbing the judgment, it should be affirmed, with costs.

Beekman, P. J., and O’Gorman, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.