Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Reitman v. Neulander

Reitman v. Neulander
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1900
31 Misc. 770; 64 N.Y.S. 349

Counsel

Jacob Rieger, for appellant., Henry L. Franklin, for respondent.

Reitman v. Neulander

Opinion of the Court

Per Ouriam.

The plaintiff offered no evidence of a demand upon the maker; the only paper offered in evidence according to the return was the note. The evidence upon a former trial and the exhibits used at that trial are in the return, but to no purpose. The evidence did not warrant a judgment upon the merits; there was simply a failure of proof. The judgment is, therefore, modified so that the action is dismissed without prejudice to a new action, and as modified, is affirmed, without costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment modified, and as modified, affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.