Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Jacques v. David

Jacques v. David
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1900
31 Misc. 782; 65 N.Y.S. 1136

Counsel

William 0. Reddy, for appellants., H. A. Yieu, for respondent Abbott., Frederick Wiener, for respondent David.

Jacques v. David

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur cannot be invoked by the plaintiffs. Although the defendant David was in possession of the premises as a tenant, the obligation, nevertheless, rested upon the plaintiffs, under the lease, to keep the premises in proper repair. If the happening of the occurrence in question warrants any inference, it must be that the plaintiffs neglected their duty in failing to keep the premises in a state of repair. On the evidence, the judgment of the court below was proper and should be affirmed.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegebioh and O’Gobman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to both defendants.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.