Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Rose v. Brady

Rose v. Brady
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1900
31 Misc. 791

Counsel

Thomas W. McEnight, for appellants., Frederick H. Lincoln, for respondent.

Rose v. Brady

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

It has been repeatedly held that all the facts necessary to confer jurisdiction upon an inferior court must appear in the record. The record contains no proof of the residence of the defendants, and, as this defect is one which may be asserted for the first time on appeal (Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151), the judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, but under the circumstances, without costs. Willis v. Parker, 30 Misc. Rep. 750; 62 N. Y. Supp. 1078.

Present: Beekmaw, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmah, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.