Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Reed v. Newman

Reed v. Newman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1900
31 Misc. 792; 65 N.Y.S. 218

Counsel

James Murphy, for appellant., George W. Gibbons, for respondent.

Reed v. Newman

Opinion of the Court

Per Guriam.

The complaint is for wages due, and plaintiff must be confined to the period during which she actually rendered services. There can be no recovery for damages for breach *793of contract under such a complaint. Fallon v. Farber, 30 Misc. Rep. 626; 62 N. Y. Supp. 742.

The judgment should, therefore, be reduced to eleven dollars and fifty cents, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegeeicii and O’Gobman,. JJ.

Judgment modified ánd as modified affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.