Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Meyer v. Riordan

Meyer v. Riordan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1900
32 Misc. 707; 65 N.Y.S. 496

Counsel

Uriah. W. Tompkins, for appellant., Manheim & Manheim, for respondent.

Meyer v. Riordan

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

An exception taken to an instruction is made the basis of this appeal.

The exception was duly taken and suffices to raise the question presented.

The vital issue was as to an employment; upon it the evidence was conflicting and very close. In answer to an inquiry made by the jury after it had retired, the court misinformed it as to the evidence, and as it cannot'he said that the misinformation did not prejudice the defendant, the judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.