Oberstein v. Diack
Oberstein v. Diack
32 Misc. 709; 65 N.Y.S. 1142
Opinion of the Court
From the judgment, it seems that the justice found $200 a fair charge for the services claimed to have been rendered for defendant.
The evidence does not warrant the finding, as there is no evidence of the value of the wife’s interest in the policy.
From the evidence, it is not clear that the services were rendered for the defendant.
Present: Truax, P. J., Soott and Dugro, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.