Katz v. Liederman
Katz v. Liederman
32 Misc. 712; 65 N.Y.S. 1137
Opinion of the Court
There is no question of law involved in this appeal. The justice had the advantage of seeing the witnesses, and an opportunity of judging as to the credit to be extended to each of them. His decision, upon the conflicting testimony, should not be disturbed.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.