Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Sondheim v. Schmidt

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 1900

32 Misc. 737; 66 N.Y.S. 1034

Counsel

A. Goldfarb, for appellant., Kurzman & Frankenheimer, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The ruling which sustained the objection to the question: “Did you in July, 1898, have any conversation with Mr. Sondheim as to cancelling the agreement with the defendants? ” was wrong and may have prejudiced the defendant.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.