Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Smith v. Palmer

Smith v. Palmer
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 1900
32 Misc. 737; 66 N.Y.S. 1145

Counsel

E. F. Brown, for appellant., M. J. Briggs, for respondent.

Smith v. Palmer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The record discloses no conflict of evidence, except as to the alleged special agreement about the rate at which visits were to he charged for. Upon the uncontradicted evidence the plaintiff was entitled to receive something. No special defenses were pleaded and none can, therefore, he availed of. The defendant did not make the objection on the trial that the hook of original entries was not produced. If she had the plaintiff might have produced it.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.