Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Fuchs v. Aaronsohn

Fuchs v. Aaronsohn
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 1900
32 Misc. 738; 66 N.Y.S. 1131

Counsel

J. H. Wood, for appellant., I. Marks, for respondent.

Fuchs v. Aaronsohn

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s claim was that at the time of the action the defendant wrongfully detained the chattels in question. The evidence showed that there was no wrongful detention, and, therefore, the judgment awarding the chattels to the defendant was proper.

The defendant not having unlawfully detained the property was entitled to recover, and as he had been deprived of the property it was proper that it should he restored to him, or that he should have its value. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.