Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Hanson v. Kaplan

Hanson v. Kaplan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 1900
33 Misc. 746; 67 N.Y.S. 135

Counsel

H. Levor, for appellant., / Da Fetra & Glaze, for respondents.

Hanson v. Kaplan

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There is a direct conflict of evidence here. This conflict has been decided by the "justice who tried the case, and with his decision, we shall not interfere.

The exceptions on pages 51, 52, 53, 58, 11 and 11 of the stenographer^ minutes are not well taken. If the defendant employed the plaintiffs and jpromised to pay them it is immaterial to whom the horses belonged.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dttgro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.