O'Reilly v. Stephens
O'Reilly v. Stephens
33 Misc. 754
Opinion of the Court
We do not think that the circumstances adverted to by the defendant’s counsel, respecting the conduct of the trial, justify the criticism made by him. They certainly cannot be said to have operated to the prejudice of his client, in view of the fact that plaintiff’s evidence, respecting the defendant’s liability, is absolutely without contradiction.
Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegebioh and O’Gobman, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.