Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Hoey v. Cloud

Hoey v. Cloud
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 15, 1900
33 Misc. 764; 67 N.Y.S. 1135

Counsel

Guggenheimer, Untermyer & Marshall (Moses Weinman, of counsel), for appellant., Albert I. Sire, for respondent.

Hoey v. Cloud

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There is not sufficient evidence in this ease to support a finding either that the petitioner had obtained a renewal of the lease of the' premises in question from her lessor or that a renewal agreement was executed between the petitioner and her sub-tenant. While there is slight evidence relating to negotiations between the petitioner and a representative of her lessor, yet it does not appear that the agreement was consummated, and the verdict of the jury is without evidence to support it. .

Final order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Beekmak, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmah, JJ.

Final order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.