Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900

Smusch v. Ravitch

Smusch v. Ravitch
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 15, 1900
33 Misc. 766; 67 N.Y.S. 900

Counsel

Nicholas Aleinikoff, for appellants., Jacob Rieger, for respondent.

Smusch v. Ravitch

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The testimony in this case is insufficient to establish a conversion. The defendants did not exercise acts of dominion over the chattels in question to the exclusion of plaintiffs rights as owner, and judgment should have been awarded to the defendants.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Present: Beekmaw, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gormaw, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new- trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.