Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Levy v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Levy v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 15, 1901 · Bischoff
34 Misc. 518; 69 N.Y.S. 973

Counsel

Henry Melville, for appellant., Jacob Friedman, for respondent.

Levy v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

Bischoff, P. J.

An appeal from an interlocutory judgment lies to the General Term (Code, § 3189), but not to the Supreme Court from the determination of the General Term upon that appeal, where final judgment is not directed. Code, § 3191, subd. 1; Monroe-Miller Co. v. Stokes, 9 Misc. Rep. 170; Fuller v. Tuska, 43 N. Y. St. Repr. 523.

Levehtbitt and Clabice, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.