Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Graut v. Langley

Graut v. Langley
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 15, 1901 · Gorman
34 Misc. 776; 68 N.Y.S. 820

Counsel

James J. Conway, for appellant., William Tharp, for respondent.

Graut v. Langley

Opinion of the Court

O’Gorman, J.

Accepting the defendant’s version of the disputed contract as correct, the ruling of the justice in directing a verdict for the plaintiff cannot be assailed. Where an attorney is retained for a particular case, and is discharged without cause, the measure of damage is ordinarily the stipulated compensation. Marsh v. Holbrook, 3 Abb. Ct. App. Dec. 178; 3 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 426, 427. The defendant did not attempt to prove that the plaintiff would incur expense in the performance of his duties, and there was, therefore, no ground laid for claiming a deduction from the fee agreed- upon.

Andrews, P. J., and Blanchard, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.