Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Finck v. Berger

Finck v. Berger
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 15, 1901
34 Misc. 803; 69 N.Y.S. 1134

Counsel

William R. Bronk, for appellant., Charles L. Hoffman, for respondent.

Finck v. Berger

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon a simple issue of fact both parties sought to impose upon the credulity of the court. The version of either has suspicious circumstances.

Judgment had to follow for the defendant as there was not sufficient credible testimony in favor of the plaintiff to carry a finding in his favor.

Present: Bisohoff, P. J., Leventritt and Clarke, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.