Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Fischer v. Conhaim

Fischer v. Conhaim
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1901
35 Misc. 791; 72 N.Y.S. 1102

Counsel

H. V. Rutherford, for appellants., J. Wilkenfeld, for respondent.

Fischer v. Conhaim

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The nonpayment of the bonus, was by the contract of employment, made dependent upon an exercise by the defendants of their reserved right to discharge the plaintiff within the year. He was not discharged, but served the full term, without any expression of dissatisfaction. He was, therefore, entitled to the extra compensation.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.