Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Weser v. Throne

Weser v. Throne
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1901
35 Misc. 812; 72 N.Y.S. 1134

Counsel

S. Sturtz, for appellant., Black, Olcott, Gruber & Bonynge, for respondents.

Weser v. Throne

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The positive testimony of the plaintiff’s witness Stover, of having left the contract of rental and the account for the first month’s rental, with a clerk of the hotel, is sufficient to establish the giving of the notice necessary to charge the defendants with knowledge that the piano was the property of the plaintiff and was not owned by the guest. This is clearly shown, notwithstanding the purely negative and somewhat contradictory testimony of hotel employees. Tinder the notice given, the defendants could not acquire any lien.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.