Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Levy v. Zeman

Levy v. Zeman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1901
35 Misc. 822; 72 N.Y.S. 1116

Counsel

Abraham L. Goldstone, for appellant., Aaron Morris, for respondent.

Levy v. Zeman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The evidence would have justified a judgment against both defendants. It was. upon the appellant’s own motion that no judgment was' rendered against the codefendant. He cannot now be heard to object that his motion was granted. The judgment was not against the weight of evidence. The defendant’s story that the services were rendered as a matter of courtesy only is most improbable.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.