Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Barney v. Mackay

Barney v. Mackay
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1901
35 Misc. 828; 72 N.Y.S. 1094

Counsel

R. A. M. Hobbs, for appellant., P. H. Loftus, for respondent.

Barney v. Mackay

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case should -have been granted, because there was entire absence of facts, showing any negligence by the driver of the runaway horses. Also, upon the whole case, it may be added, that there is no proof that he was either negligent or unskillful. The horses were- frightened by the near passage of an elevated train.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.