Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Vincent v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Vincent v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1901
35 Misc. 830; 72 N.Y.S. 1132

Counsel

H. A. Robinson (G. Glenn Worden, of counsel), for appellant., H. Gottlieb, for respondent.

Vincent v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s testimony, wholly uncorroborated, is flatly contradicted by the evidence of three disinterested witnesses, and in addition that of the motorman and conductor. The verdict, therefore, is manifestly against the weight of evidence.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial- ordered, with costs to abide event.'

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.