Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Hughes v. Martin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1901

35 Misc. 832; 72 N.Y.S. 1108

Counsel

S. G. Derrickson, for appellant., Jeroloman & Arrowsmith, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The indisputable evidence showed that defendant, under an assumed name, employed the plaintiff as a broker in realty to perform services for him. Those services were rendered, and the defendant failed to. pay the regular commission. We think the judgment awarded for such commission is correct.

Present: Scott, P. T., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.