Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Cahill v. Lichtenstadter

Cahill v. Lichtenstadter
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1901
35 Misc. 833; 72 N.Y.S. 1096

Counsel

Holt & Duross, for appellant., J. Martin, for respondent.

Cahill v. Lichtenstadter

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The evidence sufficiently establishes a prima facie case. The truck had painted upon it the words, M. Lichtenstadter, 54th Street and 1st Avenue.” It was loaded with what appeared to be flour barrels. Defendant was engaged in the flour business at 986 First avenue, near Fifty-fourth street. The facts established were sufficient to- put defendant upon his proof. Doherty v. Lord, 8 Misc. Rep. 227; Seaman v. Koehler, 122 N. Y. 646.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.