McVoy v. Keller
Opinion of the Court
The action is to recover sick benefits of six dollars per week, from October 9, 1900, to February 16, 1901, being for a period of twenty-one weeks, and aggregating $126.
Doctor Campbell, the court’s physician, certified to the first week of plaintiff’s illnéss, from October ninth, to the fifteenth, and six dollars for the week were promptly paid thereon by the association.
No other certificate was furnished except one by Doctor Covert, who certified that the plaintiff “ had been under his care since October 8, 1900. Alcohol did not cause his illness.” This certificate, defective in not stating “ the nature of the member’s illness, or the duration of the same,” was presented to Doctor Campbell, who refused to approve of it, and for that reason the secretary refused to pay any more money to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff having subscribed to these by-laws and become bound thereby, the obtaining of the certificate from Doctor Campbell, the court’s physician, or his approval of the certificate obtained from any other physician, was made a condition precedent to the plaintiff’s right of recovery, particularly in view of the fact that there was no proof that Doctor Campbell had unreasonably refused to give the certificate or approval. 1 Bacon Ben. Soc. (New ed.), § 94, 152.
For this reason and without considering the other errors assigned, the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
MacLean and Scott, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordererd, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.