Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901

Anderson v. Herold

Anderson v. Herold
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 22, 1901
69 N.Y.S. 1128 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Joseph M. Williams, for appellant., O. J. Hochstadter (Abraham B. Sehleimer, of counsel), for respondent.

Anderson v. Herold

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There are no questions of law involved in this appeal. Upon the authority of Fowler v. Marcus, 41 App. Div. 425, 58 N. Y. Supp. 867, and Katz v. Liederman, 32 Misc. Rep. 712, 65 N. Y. Supp. 1137, judgment affirmed, with,costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.