Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Horwitz v. Reinert

Horwitz v. Reinert
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 22, 1903
84 N.Y.S. 254 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James E. Smith, for appellant., Nathaniel Levy, for respondent.

Horwitz v. Reinert

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for damages to personal property of the plaintiff, whose cart containing notions, fancy goods, and hardware was run down by a wagon belonging to the defendant,, and driven by one of his employés. ' Although resting upon very slight proof, and seemingly for a large amount, the judgment may not be disturbed, as the evidence, slight as it is, was allowed to go in, generally without objection, and without the taking of a tenable exception.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.