Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Dumowith v. Marks

Dumowith v. Marks
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 6, 1903 · Blanchard
84 N.Y.S. 453 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Butler, Notman, Joline & Mynderse, for appellant., C. S. Rosenthal, for respondent.

Dumowith v. Marks

Opinion of the Court

BLANCHARD, J.

The proceedings taken by the plaintiff’s attorney, by virtue of the concluding clause of section 66 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to ascertain and enforce payment of his lien, are proper only between attorney and client. Rochfort v. Met. Street Ry. Co., 50 App. Div. 261, 63 N. Y. Supp. 1036. Nor does it appear that the plaintiff is insolvent. Youngv. Howell, 64 App. Div. 246, 72 N. Y. Supp. 5.

The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.