Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Marsh v. Bergman

Marsh v. Bergman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 6, 1903 · Blanchard
84 N.Y.S. 469 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

A. I. Spiro, for appellant., Manheim & Manheim, for respondent.

Marsh v. Bergman

Opinion of the Court

BLANCHARD, J.

This is an action brought by an employe to recover damages for wrongful discharge from the service of his employer. The evidence upon the issues was conflicting, and was properly submitted to the jury. The defendant’s exceptions are without merit. The denial of the defendant’s motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence was proper.

Judgments and orders denying defendant’s motions for a new trial on the minutes and on the ground of newly discovered evidence should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.