Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Cunningham v. Nilson

Cunningham v. Nilson
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 6, 1903 · Freedman
84 N.Y.S. 669 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Kneeland, La Fetra & Glaze, for appellant., John E. Duffy, for respondent.

Cunningham v. Nilson

Opinion of the Court

FREEDMAN, P. J.

Upon a former appeal in this case (84 N. Y. Supp. 668) it was held that the evidence presented a question of fact which should have been presented to the jury. Substantially the same state of facts were shown upon the trial from which the present appeal comes up, and the trial judge,, sitting in place of a jury, has decided in favor of the defendant. The judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.