Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Murray v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Murray v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 18, 1903 · Freedman
84 N.Y.S. 876 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Henry A. Robinson (Bayard H. Ames and F. Angelo Gaynor, of counsel), for appellant., John C. Robinson, for respondent.

Murray v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

FREEDMAN, P. J.

The plaintiff recovered for personal injuries sustained in a collision between a car of the defendant and an ice wagon on which he was riding as a helper. He was not driving, nor did he interfere in any manner with the driving. It may be questioned whether, under such circumstances, he can be charged with any negligence on the part of the driver. But even if it were so, the answer to it is that such question was submitted to the jury as one of fact, and that their finding upon this point in favor of the plaintiff should not be disturbed. The questions of defendant’s negligence and of plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence were properly submitted to the jury, and their verdict cannot be held to be against the weight of the evidence. The record discloses no reversible error.

The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.