Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Aquelina v. Provident Realty Co.

Aquelina v. Provident Realty Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 18, 1903
84 N.Y.S. 1014 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Townsend, Dyett & Levy, for appellant., Ullo & Ruebsamen, for respondent.

Aquelina v. Provident Realty Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The evidence in the case fails to show a meeting of the minds of the contracting parties on the terms of the proposed lease. No lease was executed, and no rents became due by virtue of it. The $200 was left by plaintiff with defendant as a pledge of good faith, and good faith on the part of the defendant demanded its return when, upon inspection, the plaintiff refused to execute the lease.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.